Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sales tax was payable on vegetable ghee purchased by a registered dealer from unregistered dealers, and whether the revisional and assessment orders based on the overruled single-judge decision could be sustained.
Analysis: The assessment was made under section 21 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, on the footing that the sale of vegetable ghee was wrongly exempted under the proviso to section 5(1-A) of the Act. The earlier single-judge view on which the authorities had relied had already been reversed in Letters Patent appeal. The facts of the present case were treated as identical to those in the appellate decision, and the same legal ratio governed the controversy. In these circumstances, the basis adopted by the authorities for fastening tax liability could not stand.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not liable to pay sales tax on the ghee purchased from unregistered dealers, and the assessment and revisional orders were liable to be quashed in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded and the impugned orders were set aside, leaving no order as to costs.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the controlling appellate decision on identical facts holds that no sales tax is payable, assessment or revisional orders founded on the contrary overruled view cannot be sustained.