Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the second appellate authority was justified in admitting sale patties as additional evidence and deleting the sale proceeds of silver bullion from the taxable turnover. (ii) Whether the turnover in dispute relating to gold and silver ornaments was taxable at 5 per cent or at 7 per cent for the relevant period.
Issue (i): The admissibility of additional evidence at the second appellate stage was governed by the procedural requirement in rule 61 of the Orissa Sales Tax Rules. Since no step under that rule had been taken, the appellate authority could not rely on the sale patties produced for the first time in second appeal.
Conclusion: The deletion of the sale proceeds of silver bullion from the taxable turnover was not justified.
Issue (ii): The question of the applicable rate of tax had already been settled in earlier decisions. On the relevant legal position for the period in question, the disputed turnover fell to be assessed at the higher rate.
Conclusion: The turnover in dispute was liable to be taxed at 7 per cent, not 5 per cent.
Final Conclusion: Both referred questions were answered against the assessee, and the assessment position adopted by the revenue authorities was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Additional evidence cannot be admitted at the second appellate stage except in accordance with the prescribed procedural rule, and the applicable rate of sales tax must be determined by the governing entry for the relevant period.