TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court ruling: Doctor eligible for investment allowance on X-ray equipment, not for pathological test machinery</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Dr. S. Surender Reddy</h3> The High Court of Andhra Pradesh ruled in favor of an assessee, a qualified doctor running a diagnostic center, determining eligibility for investment ... Investment Allowance Issues Involved: Determination of eligibility for investment allowance u/s 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for a diagnostic center running as a small-scale industrial undertaking.Summary:The High Court of Andhra Pradesh deliberated on the eligibility of an assessee, a qualified doctor running a diagnostic center, for investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The dispute arose when the Income-tax Officer denied the allowance, contending that the assessee was not engaged in manufacturing but providing services. The Tribunal, however, ruled in favor of the assessee, prompting the Revenue to seek the court's opinion on the matter.The Tribunal determined that the assessee qualified for investment allowance for equipment used in the laboratory for testing blood, serum, and X-ray machines, among others. It argued that the results of examinations provided in a report constituted an article or thing, making the assessee eligible for the investment allowance. The Tribunal also considered X-rays produced by the equipment as qualifying under section 32A.The court analyzed the provisions of section 32A(2)(b) and concluded that while equipment used for X-rays constituted production of a thing, machinery used for conducting pathological tests did not. It clarified that the report generated from tests did not amount to the production of an article or thing. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to the investment allowance for X-ray equipment but not for equipment used in conducting pathological tests.In conclusion, the court affirmed the Tribunal's decision regarding the eligibility for investment allowance concerning X-ray production equipment, air-conditioner, fans, stabilizer, and scanner, while denying the same for equipment used in conducting pathological tests.The judgment provides clarity on the interpretation of section 32A of the Income-tax Act in the context of a diagnostic center's eligibility for investment allowance based on the nature of the activities and equipment used in the facility.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
