Rectification jurisdiction remains limited to patent errors; discretionary failure to remand cannot be recast as apparent mistake.

Section 20 rectification is confined to patent, manifest errors apparent from the record and cannot be used to revisit matters needing argument, inference, or competing interpretations. The Tribunal noted that remand under rule 13 of the 1986 Procedure Rules is discretionary, not mandatory, so failure to exercise that discretion does not amount to an apparent mistake of law. Reliance on the superseded 1977 rules was rejected, and the remand request was treated as an impermissible attempt to reopen concluded issues and start proceedings afresh. The rectification application was therefore misconceived and not maintainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the failure to remand the matter to the Competent Authority could be treated as a mistake apparent from the record under section 20 of the Act, and whether the rectification application was maintainable in view of the governing remand rule.

Analysis: Section 20 was treated as a rectification provision confined to patent and manifest mistakes apparent from the record, capable of being corrected even suo motu. A matter requiring argument, inference, or a choice between possible views was held outside its scope. The power to remand under rule 13 of the 1986 Procedure Rules was held to be discretionary, exercisable only where the Tribunal considered it necessary, and not mandatory. The omission to invoke that discretion could not, therefore, be characterised as an apparent mistake of law. Reliance on the superseded 1977 rules was also rejected. The request for remand was further viewed as an attempt to reopen issues already concluded and to start proceedings afresh, which was impermissible in rectification jurisdiction.

Conclusion: The rectification application was misconceived and not maintainable; the Tribunal declined to direct remand, and the application failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Rectification jurisdiction is confined to obvious and patent errors apparent from the record, and a discretionary failure to order remand cannot be converted into such an error.

---