TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Validity of Notice under Section 148 Upheld, Emphasizing Appellate Order Importance for Reassessment</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Amy Colabawala</h3> Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Amy Colabawala - [2000] 243 ITR 19, 160 CTR 461, 110 TAXMANN 283 Issues involved: The judgment involves a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the validity of notice under section 148 and assessment order timing, and the presence of a finding/direction in the relevant order.Issue 1 - Validity of Notice under Section 148:The case involved co-owners of an agricultural estate being taxed as an association of persons. The Tribunal held that the sisters were not an association of persons. The Assessing Officer issued notices under section 148 to give effect to the Tribunal's order. The sisters contended that the time limit for reopening the assessment had passed, and there was no valid direction from the Tribunal. The Tribunal concluded that the parties affected were not heard, leading to a dispute on the validity of the notice.Issue 2 - Assessment Order Timing and Validity:The Tribunal accepted that certain conditions must be met for treating income as that of a third party and that the person must have been given an opportunity to be heard. The Revenue argued that the Tribunal's conclusions were erroneous, emphasizing that the observations of the Tribunal constituted a finding. The Tribunal's observations were deemed necessary for the reassessment, leading to a debate on the relevance and necessity of the Tribunal's remarks in the earlier case.Legal Analysis:Section 150 of the Income-tax Act provides for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order on appeal, allowing for reassessment based on findings or directions in appellate orders. The judgment clarified that a finding must be necessary for the disposal of an appeal in a specific assessment year. Explanations 2 and 3 of section 153 expanded the scope, allowing for assessments on persons unconnected with the appellant. The judgment concluded that the Tribunal's observations were relevant and necessary for reassessment, supporting the Revenue's position.The judgment upheld the validity of the notice under section 148 and the timing of the assessment order, emphasizing the importance of findings or directions in appellate orders for reassessment purposes. The references were disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
