Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the subsequent customs exemption notification was clarificatory or amending in nature and, on that basis, whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.
Analysis: The imported aircraft parts were covered by the earlier exemption entry in Notification No. 21/2002 dated 01-03-2002. The later notification initially restricted the benefit by reference to Chapter Heading 88.03, and the amendment made on 06-03-2007 expanded the expression to cover parts falling under any chapter. On this reasoning, the change was treated as an amending notification rather than a mere clarification. Since the earlier exemption entry had already granted benefit to aircraft parts falling under any chapter, the subsequent amendment was taken to support the same exemption position for the disputed period.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the appellant, and a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit was found.