Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether depreciation at 100% was allowable on a fluidized bed type heat dryer as an energy-saving plant.
Analysis: The depreciation table expressly referred to a fluidized bed type heat boiler, but the plant in question operated on the same fluidized-bed principle and served the same energy-conservation purpose. The distinction between a boiler and a dryer was held to be immaterial for the applicable depreciation benefit, and the issue was also covered by the Tribunal's earlier decision in the assessee's favour.
Conclusion: Depreciation at 100% was correctly allowed on the fluidized bed type heat dryer.