TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Classification of 'polynite sheets' as plastics upheld under Sales Tax Act</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Sales Tax Versus Polychem Ltd.</h3> Commissioner of Sales Tax Versus Polychem Ltd. - [1977] 39 STC 315 (Bom) Issues:Interpretation of entry 19A of Schedule E of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 regarding the classification of 'polynite sheets' as goods made primarily from plastics.Analysis:The judgment by the Bombay High Court involved a reference under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, initiated by the Commissioner of Sales Tax. The central issue was whether 'polynite sheets' manufactured and sold by the respondents should be classified as goods made primarily from plastics under entry 19A of Schedule E or under the residuary entry 22 of the schedule. The respondents contended that the products should be taxed under the residuary entry, while the Commissioner held that they fell under entry 19A. The Sales Tax Tribunal determined that the products were plastics and not goods made from plastics, thereby falling under entry 22. The key consideration was whether the products were made primarily from plastics, as per the relevant entries in Schedule E.The Court delved into the nature of the products and their manufacturing process to determine their classification. The Tribunal's analysis included defining 'plastics' as substances moldable under heat and pressure. It highlighted the manufacturing process of styron and polynite sheets, emphasizing the addition of various chemicals to create these products. The Court noted that the products were marketable and underwent processes to become granules or sheets. The Tribunal's decision was based on the understanding that the transformation of the polymer mass into these products did not change their fundamental nature as plastics, leading to the conclusion that they were not goods made primarily from plastics.Drawing parallels to a Supreme Court decision in a similar context, the Court referenced a case where iron products were processed for sale but retained their essential character as iron and steel. This comparison supported the view that the transformation of materials for sale does not alter their classification. Ultimately, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming that polynite sheets should be considered plastics and not goods made primarily from plastics. The Court directed the applicant to bear the costs of the reference, concluding the judgment in favor of the respondents.In conclusion, the judgment by the Bombay High Court resolved the issue of classification under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, affirming that polynite sheets were to be treated as plastics rather than goods made primarily from plastics. The detailed analysis considered the manufacturing process, marketability, and essential nature of the products to reach this determination, aligning with the Tribunal's decision and legal precedent.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
