Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
Analysis: The reference was decided by following the principle that, before allowing deduction under Section 80P, losses of earlier years must be set off in accordance with the Act. In view of the binding approach already applied in the earlier decision and the principle affirmed by the Supreme Court in the cited co-operative society case, the claim for deduction could not survive on the stated facts.
Conclusion: The question was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to the claimed deductions under Section 80P on the basis accepted by the Tribunal, and the reference failed in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Deduction under Section 80P is to be considered only after giving effect to the statutory set-off of earlier year losses, and if such losses exceed the available income, the deduction cannot be granted.