Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the dealer was entitled to exemption under section 10 of the Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1969, on the footing that the amounts taken from buyers were only contingency deposits and no tax had been collected on the ground that no tax could have been levied or collected.
Analysis: Exemption under section 10 required two conditions to coexist: the dealer must not have collected tax in respect of the sales, and the non-collection must have been on the ground that such tax could not have been levied or collected. The inclusion of the tax amounts in the invoices and the manner in which the receipts were linked to possible tax liability showed that the amounts were not withheld on the footing that tax was not collectible at all. The retrospective amendment also negatived the contention that the receipts remained mere deposits beyond the reach of tax liability. The principle applicable to true deposits held as custodian pending determination of liability did not assist the dealer on these facts.
Conclusion: The dealer was not entitled to exemption under section 10.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition failed and the revenue's appeal succeeded, leaving the assessment and recovery proceedings undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Exemption under section 10 of the Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1969 is available only when non-collection of tax is attributable to the belief that no tax could legally be levied or collected; amounts taken in anticipation of tax liability do not qualify.