Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the turnover of yarn held in stock on 1 August 1958 became taxable under Notification No. 2934/X-902 dated 1 August 1958, notwithstanding that the goods had already suffered tax at the hands of the importer or manufacturer before the notification.
Analysis: The notification shifted the taxable point for cotton yarn to sale by a dealer to the consumer with effect from 1 August 1958. A fresh charge was created under section 3-AA, and the taxable point under that provision was distinct from section 3-A. The fact that the assessee held the stock before the notification, or that the goods had earlier suffered tax in the hands of the importer or manufacturer, did not prevent the levy from operating on the subsequent sale to the consumer.
Conclusion: The turnover of yarn in dispute was taxable under Notification No. 2934/X-902 dated 1 August 1958, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in the affirmative, and the turnover of yarn was held liable to tax under the notification with no order as to costs.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a new taxing notification and corresponding charging provision create a fresh incidence of tax at a different point of sale, prior holding of stock or earlier taxation at another stage does not exempt the subsequent taxable sale.