Ordinary commercial meaning and embedded delivery charges govern sales tax exemption and taxable price under the Bengal Finance Act.

Exemption entries in sales tax law are construed in their ordinary commercial sense: paddy straw was not treated as either cereal or vegetable under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, so the exemption claim failed. Delivery or freight charges formed part of the sale price where the tender terms required the quoted price to include them and the bills did not separately charge them; they were therefore taxable. Reliance on material collected for verification did not vitiate the assessment on natural justice grounds where it only confirmed what the tender and bills already showed. The assessment was upheld and the appeals were rejected.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether paddy straw fell within the exemption for cereal or vegetable under section 6 and item 6 of Schedule I of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941; (ii) whether delivery charges formed part of the sale price under section 2(h) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941; and (iii) whether the assessment was vitiated for breach of natural justice by reliance on material collected without notice.

Issue (i): Whether paddy straw fell within the exemption for cereal or vegetable under section 6 and item 6 of Schedule I of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941.

Analysis: The exemption for vegetables was confined to vegetables, green or dried, commonly known as sabji, tarkari or sak, understood in common parlance and not in any technical or botanical sense. Paddy straw could not be treated as a vegetable for table use, and it was also not shown to answer the ordinary meaning of cereal in the statutory setting.

Conclusion: The claim to exemption failed and paddy straw was held not to be either cereal or vegetable for the purpose of the Act.

Issue (ii): Whether delivery charges formed part of the sale price under section 2(h) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941.

Analysis: Under section 2(h), sale price excludes freight or delivery cost only when such cost is separately charged. On the facts, the tender terms required the quoted price to include delivery charges, and the bills did not separately charge those amounts. The amounts were therefore treated as part of the price realised for the goods.

Conclusion: Delivery charges were held includible in the sale price and taxable accordingly.

Issue (iii): Whether the assessment was vitiated for breach of natural justice by reliance on material collected without notice.

Analysis: The material gathered from the Haringhata Dairy Farm was used to verify what the tender and bills themselves showed, namely that delivery charges were included in the quoted price and were not separately billed. In those circumstances, the complaint of denial of opportunity did not affect the assessment.

Conclusion: No breach of natural justice vitiating the assessment was established.

Final Conclusion: The statutory exemption was unavailable, the delivery charges formed part of the taxable price, and the assessment was not invalidated on procedural grounds, so the appeals were rejected.

Ratio Decidendi: In sales tax law, expressions in exemption schedules are construed in their ordinary commercial sense, and delivery or freight charges are deductible from taxable turnover only when they are separately charged and not embedded in the sale price.

---