1998 (3) TMI 28 - HC - Income Tax

Court clarifies treatment of interest expenditure & sales tax liability under Income-tax Act, 1961

The court ruled in favor of the Department regarding the interpretation of section 40A(8) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, stating that net expenditure cannot ... Business Expenditure, Company, Accounting Issues:1. Interpretation of section 40A(8) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Disallowance under section 40A(8) based on interest paid without deducting interest received.2. Claim of deduction for sales-tax liability - Allowability of sales tax liability as a deduction when not paid to the Government due to pending sales tax proceedings.Analysis:1. The first issue pertains to the interpretation of section 40A(8) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court considered the question raised by the assessee regarding the disallowance under section 40A(8) concerning interest paid without deducting the interest received. Referring to a previous decision in Andhra Prabha (P.) Ltd. v. CIT [1999] 238 ITR 525, the court held that 'expenditure' under section 40A(8) does not include net expenditure after setting off interest income. Therefore, the court answered the question in the affirmative and against the assessee, emphasizing that the net expenditure cannot be considered after setting off interest income.2. The second issue involves the claim of the assessee for the deduction of sales tax liability. The court noted that the assessee maintained a mercantile system of accounting and collected a sum as sales tax, which was brought to tax by the Income-tax Officer. However, the Tribunal found that under the mercantile system of accounting, the assessee could treat the sales tax collected as a liability due to the Government. The court considered a decision of the Supreme Court in the assessee's case under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, which confirmed the liability on the sale of surplus copies of the newspaper. Based on this, the court concluded that the sales tax liability should be treated as a deductible item in the computation of income, despite the corresponding amount collected being taxed. Therefore, the court answered the question in the affirmative and against the Department, allowing the deduction of the sales tax liability as a legitimate expense.In conclusion, the court's judgment addressed the interpretation of section 40A(8) regarding interest expenditure and the allowance of sales tax liability as a deduction, providing clarity on these tax-related issues for the parties involved.