Purchase turnover includes delivery-linked contract charges; sugarcane setts are not sugarcane in ordinary commercial usage.

Amounts paid under a supply contract that are directly linked to the quantity delivered and form part of the agreed f.o.r. factory delivery terms are treated as part of the purchase price, not as separate voluntary transportation charges, so they enter taxable purchase turnover. The note also explains that, where the statute does not define the term, "sugarcane" is construed in its ordinary commercial sense; sugarcane setts are treated as seed material rather than sugarcane itself. On that basis, supply of setts is not covered by the same purchase-point treatment as sugarcane.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the amount paid as transportation charges to sugarcane growers formed part of the taxable purchase turnover and was exempt from tax; (ii) Whether sugarcane setts are covered by the expression "sugarcane" for levy under the purchase-point provision.

Issue (i): Whether the amount paid as transportation charges to sugarcane growers formed part of the taxable purchase turnover and was exempt from tax.

Analysis: The payment was made under contracts requiring delivery of sugarcane f.o.r. factory premises. On the facts, the additional amount was directly linked to the quantity of sugarcane supplied and represented an enhancement of the contract price rather than a voluntary or ex gratia payment. Even if described as transportation charges, it was part of the consideration for the supply of sugarcane and therefore entered the purchase turnover.

Conclusion: The amount was includible in the turnover and was liable to tax under section 5(3)(b) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

Issue (ii): Whether sugarcane setts are covered by the expression "sugarcane" for levy under the purchase-point provision.

Analysis: Sugarcane setts were treated as sugarcane seeds and, in the commercial or popular sense, were not understood as sugarcane itself. Since the Act did not define the expression, it had to be construed in its ordinary commercial meaning. On that test, an agreement for sugarcane was not performed by supply of sugarcane setts, and vice versa.

Conclusion: Sugarcane setts were not covered by the expression "sugarcane" and were taxable under section 5(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

Final Conclusion: Both questions were answered against the dealer, and the revision petition was dismissed with costs.

Ratio Decidendi: Amounts paid under a supply contract that are directly referable to the quantity supplied and are part of the agreed delivery terms form part of the purchase price, and the expression "sugarcane" must be understood in its ordinary commercial sense unless the statute provides otherwise.

---