Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the unsigned draft assessment order dated 14 March 1961 was a valid assessment order under section 7 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act read with rule 41(5) of the Rules framed thereunder. (ii) Whether the subsequent assessment order dated 16 March 1964 passed by the successor Sales Tax Officer was valid when a prior order was said to have been made by the predecessor.
Issue (i): Whether the unsigned draft assessment order dated 14 March 1961 was a valid assessment order under section 7 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act read with rule 41(5) of the Rules framed thereunder.
Analysis: The draft prepared by the original Sales Tax Officer was never signed and was submitted for approval of superior authority. The surrounding circumstances showed that the officer intended the draft to remain provisional and to be finalised only after receiving directions. An order does not attain finality merely because it has been drafted; it becomes operative only when the officer intends it to be the final expression of decision and brings it into completed form.
Conclusion: The unsigned draft was not a valid assessment order.
Issue (ii): Whether the subsequent assessment order dated 16 March 1964 passed by the successor Sales Tax Officer was valid when a prior order was said to have been made by the predecessor.
Analysis: Since the earlier draft never matured into a valid assessment order, there was no concluded assessment to bar further action by the successor. The successor was therefore competent to complete the assessment proceedings under the statutory provision and the rule.
Conclusion: The subsequent assessment order was valid.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the department, and the successor's assessment order was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: A draft assessment order does not become a valid or operative order unless it is completed and intended to be final; an unsigned and unfinalised draft cannot preclude a successor authority from making a valid assessment order.