Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption from Central sales tax under section 8(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, on the basis of the State notification exempting the sale of medicines dispensed by a medical practitioner from his own dispensary.
Analysis: Section 8(2A) grants nil tax or a lower rate only where the sale or purchase of goods is exempt from tax generally under the sales tax law of the appropriate State. Its Explanation excludes cases where the exemption operates only in specified circumstances or under specified conditions. The State notification relied on exempted only sales of medicines dispensed by a medical practitioner owning a dispensary and dispensing medicines to his patients from his own dispensary, and therefore operated under a limited and conditional category rather than as a general exemption. The exemption was thus confined to a special class of transactions and did not satisfy the statutory requirement of a general exemption.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to the benefit of section 8(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and the Tribunal was wrong in extending the exemption.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption under section 8(2A) applies only where the relevant State law grants a general exemption from tax; a conditional or circumstance-specific exemption does not qualify.