Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a reference to the High Court lay under section 23(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1946, from an order passed by the Tribunal in rectification proceedings under section 23A of that Act.
Analysis: Section 23(1) authorises a reference only from orders passed by the Tribunal under section 21(2) or section 22(1). An order made in rectification under section 23A is a distinct order and is not one of the orders specified in section 23(1). The wording of the provision, read on its plain and grammatical construction, leaves no room to include rectification orders by implication. The analogous provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1922, support the same conclusion, because the right of reference there too was confined to appellate orders and did not extend to rectification orders. The High Court therefore had no jurisdiction to entertain references arising solely out of rectification orders under section 23A.
Conclusion: The reference was not maintainable, and the preliminary objection was rightly upheld.
Final Conclusion: Orders passed in rectification proceedings under section 23A did not give rise to a valid reference under section 23(1) of the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute confers reference jurisdiction only in respect of specified categories of orders, a rectification order not included in that enumeration cannot be treated as an order from which a reference lies.