1975 (7) TMI 129 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Court rules contractor liable for purchase tax on materials supplied by Public Works Department

Commissioner of Sales Tax, MP Versus Mohammad Zahoor

Commissioner of Sales Tax, MP Versus Mohammad Zahoor - [1975] 36 STC 414 (MP) Issues:1. Interpretation of whether the iron and cement supplied by the Public Works Department (PWD) to the contractor for use in construction works constitutes a sale liable to purchase tax under section 7(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act.Analysis:1. The judgment pertains to a reference under section 44 of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act concerning the tax liability on materials supplied by the PWD to a contractor. The Tribunal referred the question of whether the supply of iron and cement by the PWD to the contractor constitutes a sale liable for purchase tax. The relevant contracts and assessment orders for the years 1961-62, 1963-64, and 1965-66 were considered in determining the tax liability.2. The assessing authority held the contractor liable for purchase tax on the iron and cement supplied by the PWD, as the price was deducted from the contractor's payments. The clause in the contract between the contractor and the PWD specified that unused materials supplied by the PWD remain the property of the government and cannot be returned by the contractor. This arrangement led to the conclusion that the contractor was liable for purchase tax under section 7(1) of the Act.3. The judgment highlighted the misinterpretation by the Board of Revenue, which erroneously concluded that the contractor could return unused materials to the PWD, contrary to the contract terms. The judgment emphasized that the contractor had no ownership rights over the supplied materials and the price deductions were indicative of a purchase transaction, making the contractor liable for purchase tax.4. The judgment further emphasized that the entirety of the contract terms, particularly the provision preventing the return of unused materials, indicated a transfer of property and a purchase transaction. The contractor's inability to return the materials signified that the contractor had acquired ownership, leading to the liability for purchase tax as per the Act.5. Ultimately, the court answered the reference in the affirmative, stating that the iron and cement supplied by the PWD to the contractor constituted a sale liable for purchase tax under section 7(1) of the Act. The case was remanded to the Tribunal for further legal proceedings based on this opinion.6. The judgment provides a detailed analysis of the contractual terms, the nature of the transaction, and the legal implications under the Sales Tax Act, culminating in the determination of the tax liability on the materials supplied by the PWD to the contractor.