Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sales of confiscated goods by customs authorities through auctioneers amounted to sales by a dealer in the course of business so as to make the assessee's sales the first taxable sales under section 3(2) and the relevant items of the First Schedule to the General Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Analysis: The auctioneers merely brought buyer and seller together and had neither dominion over nor possession of the goods. Collection of sales tax by them did not make them dealers. The customs department also was not carrying on business when it periodically sold confiscated goods in discharge of statutory functions. Under section 3(2), read with section 2(n), the first sale contemplated by the Schedule is the first sale by a dealer in the course of business inside the State, not merely the first factual sale by any person.
Conclusion: The sales by the customs authorities and auctioneers were not sales by a dealer in the course of business, and the assessee's sales were rightly treated as the first taxable sales. The challenge failed.