Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the period of limitation for filing appeals against assessment orders commenced from service of the demand notices or only from service of the copies of the assessment orders recording reasons.
Analysis: The period of limitation for an appeal under section 20 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, was held to begin when the assessee is served with the assessment order containing the reasons for the assessment, because only then does the assessee have notice of the assessment and a meaningful opportunity to challenge it. Under amended rule 22(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, 1957, where the turnover determined differs from the return, the assessing authority is required to record reasons briefly in writing and furnish a copy to the assessee. Since the assessment orders were not served and the assessee received the copies only on 1 February 1972, the appeals could not be treated as time-barred from the date of the demand notices.
Conclusion: The limitation period commenced on service of the assessment orders, not on service of the demand notices, and the appeals were within time. The rejection of the appeals as barred by limitation was , and the matter required restoration for disposal on merits.
Final Conclusion: The revisional challenges succeeded, the limitation objection failed, and the appeals were directed to be entertained and decided afresh according to law.
Ratio Decidendi: Limitation for an appeal against an assessment starts only upon service of the assessment order recording reasons where such service is mandated, not upon service of a demand notice alone.