Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether hosiery banyans were exempt from sales tax under item 23 of Schedule III of the notification dated 1 July 1959 by reason of the expression "cotton fabrics".
Analysis: The exemption notification had to be read with the subsequent retrospective notification of 5 August 1959, which expressly added hosiery cloth sold in lengths, and with the later notification of 19 October 1966, which expressly added cotton hosiery goods. The surrounding scheme showed that hosiery cloth and hosiery goods were not treated as included in the broad expression "cotton fabrics" in item 23. The definition of cotton fabrics in the Central excise law was also examined, but in the context of the State notification the expression was used in a narrower sense. Hosiery banyans were distinct from hosiery cloth and could not be brought within the exemption by implication.
Conclusion: Hosiery banyans were not exempt from sales tax under item 23 of Schedule III of the notification dated 1 July 1959, and the reference was answered against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxing exemption notification later expressly includes a commodity by specific entry, the commodity cannot be treated as having been covered earlier by a general expression unless the notification clearly so provides.