1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Partially granted petition halts recovery pending partnership status inquiry</h1> The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the Sales Tax Officer to conduct an inquiry to determine the petitioner's partnership status in the ... - Issues:1. Assessment orders passed by the Sales Tax Officer against the firm Ram Sewak Pramod Kumar.2. Dispute regarding the partnership status of the petitioner Uma Shanker in the firm.3. Recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner based on the recovery certificate issued by the Sales Tax Officer.Analysis:The judgment of the court pertained to assessment orders issued by the Sales Tax Officer against the firm Ram Sewak Pramod Kumar. The assessment orders indicated that the firm was liable to pay taxes for specific years, and a recovery certificate was issued to the Collector for the outstanding amounts. The recovery certificate listed both Ram Sewak and Uma Shanker as partners of the firm. However, the petitioner, Uma Shanker, contested this assertion, claiming he was not a partner in the firm and had no association with it. This led to the petitioner approaching the court under Article 226 of the Constitution to challenge the recovery proceedings.In the counter-affidavit, it was highlighted that the application for registration of the firm mentioned both Ram Sewak and Uma Shanker as partners. Nonetheless, there was no evidence that the petitioner had signed the registration application. The assessment order failed to conclusively determine the partners of the firm responsible for tax payment. The court emphasized the importance of ascertaining the status of the assessee, especially in cases involving partnerships, to avoid disputes and ensure proper enforcement of tax liabilities.Referring to a prior case, the court underscored the necessity for a thorough enquiry to establish the partners of an assessee firm before initiating recovery proceedings. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the Sales Tax Officer to conduct an inquiry to determine the petitioner's partnership status in the firm. Pending the outcome of this inquiry, the recovery proceedings against the petitioner were stayed. The judgment highlighted the significance of proper investigation and findings regarding the partners of a firm to prevent unjust enforcement actions.In conclusion, the petition was partly allowed, with the court ordering a halt to the recovery proceedings against the petitioner until the Sales Tax Officer determined the petitioner's partnership status in the assessee-firm. This decision underscored the need for thorough assessments and inquiries to establish the liability of partners in a firm accurately, ensuring fair and lawful enforcement of tax obligations.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
