Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reinforced cement concrete pipes manufactured by the petitioner were liable to sales tax at 3 per cent as "wares made of any metal or alloy other than brass and aluminium" under the notification dated 21 May 1963.
Analysis: The English and Hindi versions of the notification were read together. On that reading, the word "ware" was understood in the sense of articles commonly used as utensils. The entry was therefore confined to utensils and similar wares, and not to every article containing metal. The pipes manufactured by the petitioner were made of cement, sand and stone grits reinforced with steel wires and rods, and could not by any stretch of imagination be treated as utensils. The revisional view that substantial metal content alone brought the pipes within the entry was rejected.
Conclusion: The pipes were not taxable at 3 per cent under the notification and the assessment could not be sustained on that basis.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was allowed, the revisional order was quashed, and the appellate order in favour of the petitioner was restored.
Ratio Decidendi: A taxing entry using the expression "wares made of any metal or alloy" must be construed in the context of the notification as a whole, and articles not answerable to the sense of utensils or similar wares do not fall within it merely because they contain metal.