Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the tax levied on inter-State sales deemed to be inside sales under Explanation (2) to section 2(h) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act was validated by the Sales Tax Laws Validation Act, 1956 despite the restrictions in Article 286 of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: The turnover related to inter-State transactions during the statutory validation period. The constitutional ban under Article 286(1)(a) and Article 286(2) had created difficulty for State sales tax levies imposed under the earlier understanding of the law. The court held that Explanation (2) to section 2(h) did not merely create a fiction without tax consequences, but treated the covered transactions as inter-State sales statutorily deemed to be inside sales within the charging scheme. The language of Section 2 of the Sales Tax Laws Validation Act, 1956 was read broadly enough to save any State law authorising tax on sales or purchases in the course of inter-State trade or commerce during the relevant period.
Conclusion: The tax was held to be authorised and covered by the Validation Act, and the challenge to its levy failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory deeming provision treating an inter-State sale as an inside sale for purposes of tax, when read with the charging provision, can fall within a validation enactment that saves taxes on sales in the course of inter-State trade or commerce during the specified period.