TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether printed judgments and ration cards are "paper products" within item 42 of Schedule I to the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; (ii) whether the receipts for printing and supply of ration cards constitute taxable turnover as sales or are attributable to work and labour under a works contract.
Issue (i): Whether printed judgments and ration cards are "paper products" within item 42 of Schedule I to the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.
Analysis: The expression "paper products" was construed in common parlance. Material merely printed on paper does not, by that process alone, become a product of paper. Paper used as the medium for printing remains incidental where the essence of the transaction is the printing work or the finished article. On that basis, printed judgments were held not to be paper products, and ration cards, though finished articles, were also found not to fall within item 42 as paper products.
Conclusion: The printed judgments and ration cards are not "paper products" under item 42 of Schedule I.
Issue (ii): Whether the receipts for printing and supply of ration cards constitute taxable turnover as sales or are attributable to work and labour under a works contract.
Analysis: The real character of the contract was held to be decisive. If the contract is essentially for work and labour, it is not divisible into artificial contracts for paper and printing merely because paper is used in execution. Where the essential object is the supply of finished ration cards, the transaction is one for sale of goods; where the contract is essentially for printing judgments, it is a works contract. On the facts, the ration card contract was treated as one for the sale of finished articles and therefore taxable, though only at the general sales tax rate and not at the higher rate applicable to paper products.
Conclusion: The ration card contract is taxable as a sale of finished goods, while the printing of judgments is not taxable as sale turnover.
Final Conclusion: The assessment was sustained in part for ration cards at the general rate, but the turnover relating to printed judgments was excluded from taxation; the connected appeals and petition were disposed of accordingly.
Ratio Decidendi: Printing matter on paper does not, by itself, convert the finished printed article into a product of paper; the taxability of such transactions depends on the essential character of the contract, and an artificial bifurcation into paper sale and printing charges is impermissible where the contract is essentially one of work and labour.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
