Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether silk yarn prepared by reeling cocoon filaments on a charka amounts to hand-spun yarn within item 20 of para. 4 of G. O. Ms. No. 1091 dated 10 June 1957, and whether assessment-revision notices seeking to tax such transactions were valid.
Analysis: The expression "hand-spun" was treated as an ordinary commercial term, not a term of art. In construing it, the Court relied on dictionary meaning, trade usage, and administrative practice, and noted that the product was understood in trade circles as hand-spun silk yarn. The process of picking, twisting, and reeling the filaments on a charka was held to be manual preparation of yarn, and the Court rejected the contention that the cocoon's natural emission of filaments displaced the character of the yarn as hand-spun. The exemption under section 9 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was read as intended to protect and encourage the small-scale cottage industry and the self-employment it generated.
Conclusion: Silk yarn prepared in the manner described was held to be hand-spun silk yarn and therefore exempt from tax; the revision notices were misconceived and the writ of prohibition was rightly issued.