Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether batteries used in motor vehicles were taxable at the rate of six pies per rupee under the earlier notification, or at seven per cent as "electrical goods" under the later notification.
Analysis: The earlier notification specifically dealt with motor vehicles and their component parts, including batteries, and prescribed the rate of six pies per rupee. The later notification under section 3-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act prescribed a rate for goods included in its schedule, but did not make any provision for motor vehicles or their component parts. A later notification supersedes an earlier one only to the extent of inconsistency or repugnancy. Since the later notification did not cover motor vehicles or their component parts, it could not displace the earlier specific rate applicable to batteries as component parts of motor vehicles.
Conclusion: Batteries used in motor vehicles were taxable at six pies per rupee under the earlier notification, and the assessee succeeded on the reference.
Ratio Decidendi: A later taxing notification overrides an earlier specific notification only to the extent of actual inconsistency or repugnancy, and a specific rate for component parts remains applicable where the later notification does not cover that subject.