Tribunal restores disallowed sum under section 14A, allows Mark to Market Loss on Future Contracts

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the restoration of the disallowed sum of Rs. 1.00 lac related to disallowance under section 14A for tax-free interest income and dividends. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to allow the appellant's claim of Mark to Market Loss on Future Contracts amounting to Rs. 9,25,911, based on the treatment of anticipated losses on derivatives as stock-in-trade.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance under section 14A for tax-free interest income and dividend.
2. Disallowance of Mark to Market Loss on Future Contracts.

Issue 1: Disallowance under section 14A for tax-free interest income and dividend:
The appellant, an individual dealing in shares and investments, contested the addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 14A for expenses related to earning tax-free interest income on RBI Bonds and dividends. The appellant argued that no expenses were incurred in earning the said income, which did not form part of the total income. The CIT(A) directed the application of Rule 8D for disallowance based on a Special Bench decision. However, the Tribunal referred to a Bombay High Court judgment stating that Rule 8D would not apply to assessment years before 2008-09. The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer's estimation of expenses reasonable and directed the restoration of the disallowed sum of Rs. 1.00 lac.

Issue 2: Disallowance of Mark to Market Loss on Future Contracts:
The appellant claimed a Mark to Market Loss of Rs. 9,25,911 on Future Contracts, following accounting guidelines by ICAI. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim, stating that derivative contracts did not constitute stock in trade and mark to market losses were considered as unascertained liabilities. The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's decision. However, the Tribunal referenced a previous decision involving a similar issue and held that the provision for anticipated losses on derivatives, treated as stock-in-trade, should be allowed. Following this precedent, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the claim made by the appellant.

In conclusion, the appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal, with directions given regarding the disallowance under section 14A and the treatment of Mark to Market Loss on Future Contracts.

---