Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sales tax could be levied on the turnover of exercise books, account books and similar books under the relevant Government Order, and whether the assessment orders collecting such tax were liable to be quashed with refund of the tax collected.
Analysis: The Court followed its earlier decision holding that the expression "all books" in the Government Order covered day-books, account books, ledgers, journals, blank sheets fastened together and similar books, and therefore included exercise books and account books. On that construction, the turnover in question was not exigible to sales tax. The tax had been collected under a mistake of law, and there was no reason to depart from the earlier binding view. The same legal position governed the connected writ petitions as well.
Conclusion: The assessment orders, to the extent they levied tax on the turnover of exercise books, account books and similar books, were quashed and refund of the tax collected was directed in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions were allowed and the department was directed to refund the tax collected on the disputed turnovers.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a prior binding interpretation of an exemption entry covers the goods in question, sales tax collected contrary to that interpretation is liable to be quashed and refunded as tax collected under a mistake of law.