Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether planks, rafters and cut sizes sawn or cut from logs of wood remain "timber" within item 63 of the First Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, and whether such goods could be treated as general goods taxable under section 5 of the Act.
Analysis: The expression "timber" was construed in its ordinary and commercial sense, since it was not a technical term and was not defined in the Act. The materials placed before the Court, together with administrative practice and trade usage, showed that timber in common and commercial parlance includes logs as well as planks, rafters and cut sizes prepared for building purposes. Applying the accepted principles that tax entries are to be understood according to common usage and commercial understanding, the Court held that mere sawing or cutting of logs for convenience of sale does not change their character or create a commercially different commodity. The goods continued to be timber and therefore remained within item 63.
Conclusion: Planks, rafters and cut sizes sawn from logs of wood are timber within item 63 and cannot be taxed as general goods under section 5 of the Act; the levy sought under section 5 was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: A commodity used in a sales tax entry must be construed in its common and commercial parlance, and processing that does not destroy its commercial identity does not take it outside the taxing entry.