Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, before imposing penalty under section 15-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, the dealer was given a reasonable opportunity of being heard as required by section 15-A(3).
Analysis: The relevant statutory scheme required both notice to the dealer and a reasonable opportunity of being heard before penalty could be imposed. The notice issued in the case informed the dealer of the tax default, stated that penalty was proposed under section 15-A(1)(c), and fixed a specific date on which the dealer could show cause. The fixing of that date was treated as affording the dealer an opportunity to appear and make submissions orally or in writing. The court distinguished the cited earlier decision on the ground that there the notice did not fix any date for appearance, whereas here the notice did so and therefore complied with the statutory requirement.
Conclusion: The dealer was given a reasonable opportunity of being heard before the penalty was imposed, and section 15-A(3) was duly complied with.
Ratio Decidendi: A show cause notice under a penalty provision that specifies the proposed penalty and fixes a date for appearance or explanation can satisfy the statutory requirement of a reasonable opportunity of being heard.