Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessing authority had jurisdiction to issue notice to the petitioner in respect of earlier exemptions and tax liability after the business was taken over as a running concern.
Analysis: The petitioner had taken over the Madras Type Foundry as a running concern and stepped into the shoes of the earlier management. On that footing, the business transfer was not confined to assets alone but extended to the incidents of the business, including liabilities that could be pursued under the Act. Section 27 was treated as covering such transfer, and the authority was entitled to enquire into the correctness of exemptions granted in earlier years. The notice was therefore part of a lawful exercise of jurisdiction and not an action without authority.
Conclusion: The assessing authority had jurisdiction to issue the impugned notice, and the request for prohibition failed.