TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessment of Turnover in Silver Ornaments: Legal Analysis and Principles</h1> <h3>Hukum Chand Mahendra Kumar Versus Commissioner of Sales Tax, UP.</h3> Hukum Chand Mahendra Kumar Versus Commissioner of Sales Tax, UP. - [1972] 29 STC 394 (All) Issues: Assessment of turnover based on survey report, relevance of suppression detected in one year for other assessment years, rejection of account books for multiple years.Analysis:The judgment delivered by the Allahabad High Court involved the assessment of turnover for the years 1959-60 to 1965-66 for a dealer in silver ornaments based on a survey report and other relevant factors. The court addressed three key questions referred to them. Firstly, whether the survey report dated 9th May, 1961, was relevant for years other than 1961-62. The court emphasized that the material discovered during a survey may be relevant for different years if it pertains to suppression across those years. In this case, the survey directly related to the suppression of turnover in 1961-62 and was found to be relevant for subsequent years due to defective accounts and unvouched purchases in those years.Regarding the second question on whether the suppression detected in 1961-62 could justify an inference of suppression in other years, the court held that while the suppression alone may not be sufficient, when coupled with other circumstances, it becomes relevant for assessing turnover in the remaining years. The court highlighted the importance of considering the overall account quality and market reputation of the assessee when estimating turnover after rejecting account books.Lastly, the court addressed the rejection of account books for years other than 1961-62. It was noted that once the account books are rejected, turnover estimation becomes crucial, taking into account the past record, accounting practices, and market reputation of the assessee. The court upheld the rejection of account books for all years based on the defective nature of the accounts and unvouched purchases, leading to the estimation of turnover based on stock positions and commercial practices.In conclusion, the court answered the three questions by stating that the survey report was relevant for subsequent years, suppression detected in 1961-62 was significant when coupled with other circumstances, and there was sufficient material to reject the account books for the years in question. The court ordered the assessee to pay costs to the Commissioner and provided a comprehensive analysis of the issues raised in the case, ensuring a thorough examination of the assessment process and relevant legal principles.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
