Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Bhojanalaya turnover not exempt from sales tax under Notification 965-V-ST. Tribunal interpretation upheld.</h1> <h3>Purohit Lodge Versus Commissioner of Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh</h3> Purohit Lodge Versus Commissioner of Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh - [1972] 29 STC 383 (MP) The High Court of Madhya Pradesh held that the turnover of the assessee's bhojanalaya is not exempt from sales tax under Notification No. 965-V-ST dated 31st March, 1964. The court agreed with the Sales Tax Officer's conclusion that the assessee's establishment does not qualify as a small operator under the notification. The interpretation by the Sales Tax Tribunal was deemed correct. The parties will bear their own costs.