Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 49(3)(a) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act permits production of sales tax department records in evidence in an election petition, or whether the confidentiality bar in section 49(1) continues to prohibit such production.
Analysis: Section 49(1) imposes a confidentiality mandate on particulars contained in returns, statements, accounts, documents, and recorded evidence furnished or produced under the Act, and it also restrains courts from requiring their production. The exception in section 49(3)(a) is framed in relation to disclosure for the purpose of investigation or prosecution under the Act, the Indian Penal Code, 1860, or any other enactment. Read in context, the expression "investigation" is linked with "prosecution" and the exception is confined to criminal investigations and prosecutions. It cannot be expanded to cover an election enquiry or other non-criminal proceedings, because that would substantially defeat the confidentiality protection created by section 49(1).
Conclusion: The prohibition on production of the sales tax department records applied, and the records could not be taken in evidence in the election petition.