1971 (9) TMI 164 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Court orders inclusion of goods in tax registration, emphasizing interconnected agricultural and manufacturing activities.

The court allowed the petitions, directing the respondent to include the excluded goods in the Central Sales Tax registration certificate. The court found ... - Issues Involved:1. Entitlement to include specific articles in the Central Sales Tax registration certificate.2. Interpretation of 'goods required for use in the manufacture or processing of goods for sale' under Section 8(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.3. Applicability of Rule 13 of the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957.4. Relationship between agricultural and manufacturing activities for tax purposes.5. Relevance of precedents and statutory provisions in determining the scope of goods includible in the registration certificate.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Entitlement to Include Specific Articles in the Central Sales Tax Registration Certificate:The primary question was whether the petitioner was entitled to include certain articles in the Central Sales Tax registration certificate under Section 7 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The petitioner, a company involved in tea planting and manufacturing, sought to include materials essential for tea cultivation and processing. The registration certificate initially included these items, but the sales tax authorities later issued a show-cause notice to exclude them, arguing that they were not essential for manufacturing tea.2. Interpretation of 'Goods Required for Use in the Manufacture or Processing of Goods for Sale' under Section 8(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956:The court examined Section 8(3) of the Act, which allows registered dealers to purchase goods at a concessional rate if they are used in the manufacture or processing of goods for sale. The court emphasized that the goods must be integral to the manufacturing process. The petitioner argued that the excluded items were essential for manufacturing tea, while the revenue contended that agricultural and manufacturing activities were separate.3. Applicability of Rule 13 of the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957:Rule 13 expands the scope of goods mentioned in Section 8(3) to include raw materials, processing materials, machinery, plant, equipment, tools, stores, spare parts, accessories, etc., used in manufacturing or processing goods for sale. The court noted that the goods excluded by the respondent were necessary for the agricultural process, which is integrally connected to manufacturing tea.4. Relationship between Agricultural and Manufacturing Activities for Tax Purposes:The court held that the agricultural and manufacturing activities of the petitioner were inseparable. The process of growing tea leaves was directly connected to manufacturing tea. The court cited the Supreme Court's decision in J.K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer, which stated that processes integrally connected with ultimate production fall within the expression 'in the manufacture of goods.' The court found that the agricultural process was essential for manufacturing tea, making the excluded goods necessary for the manufacturing process.5. Relevance of Precedents and Statutory Provisions in Determining the Scope of Goods Includible in the Registration Certificate:The court referred to relevant precedents, including the Supreme Court's decisions in J.K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. and Indian Copper Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes. These cases supported the inclusion of goods used in processes integrally connected to manufacturing. The court also considered the definition of 'agricultural income' under the Indian Income-tax Act and the Madras Agricultural Income-tax Act, which treat the growing and manufacturing of tea as integrated activities. The court disagreed with the Kerala High Court's decision in Travancore Tea Estates Co. Ltd. v. The State of Kerala, which held that goods used in agricultural activities preceding industrial activities could not be included in the registration certificate.Conclusion:The court concluded that the agricultural and manufacturing activities of the petitioner were inseparably linked, and the goods required for agricultural activities were essential for manufacturing tea. Therefore, these goods should be included in the Central Sales Tax registration certificate. The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the respondent to amend the certificate accordingly.Petitions Allowed:The court allowed the petitions and directed the respondent to amend the registration certificate to include the excluded goods. There was no order as to costs.