Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under section 8(1-A) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act could be recovered when, after the appellate order reducing the assessment, no fresh notice of demand had been served.
Analysis: Under section 8(1) read with Rule 45, tax becomes payable only after service of the notice of demand specifying the time and manner of payment. Where an appellate order modifies the assessment, the original notice of demand ceases to be effective and a fresh notice of demand is necessary to fasten default. Section 8(1-A) makes interest payable only when the tax payable under section 8(1) remains unpaid for the prescribed period after expiry of the time stated in the notice of demand. Since no fresh notice was served after the appellate reduction of tax, the assessee could not be treated as being in default for purposes of interest.
Conclusion: The recovery of interest was not valid and the petitioner was not liable to pay interest in the absence of a fresh notice of demand after the appellate order.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest under section 8(1-A) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act is recoverable only after a valid notice of demand makes the tax payable, and where an appellate order alters the assessment, a fresh notice of demand is a condition precedent to the assessee's liability for interest.