Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the contract for supply and erection of electrical installations was an indivisible works contract, so that the value of materials supplied under it was not exigible to sales tax.
Analysis: The contract documents, read as a whole, showed that the supply of materials was not a separate and independent sale but formed part of a single arrangement for designing, supplying and erecting the power supply system and cabling work. The specification of item-wise prices, payment in instalments, and the inclusion of materials supplied by the purchaser itself in the contractor's bill were treated as consistent with a works contract and not as evidence of a standalone sale. The decisive test was whether there was a clear contract of sale of the very goods in which property passed, or whether the materials were merely incidental to the execution of the work. On the facts found, property in the materials passed only along with completion and delivery of the entire installation.
Conclusion: The contract was rightly construed as a works contract and the materials supplied under it were not liable to sales tax.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the supply of materials is integral to an indivisible contract for execution and erection of work, and there is no separate contract of sale of the materials as such, the transaction is not a taxable sale of goods.