Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a reference under section 44 of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act lay against an order of remand where no final assessment had yet been made and the impugned order did not alter the assessed tax liability.
Analysis: The expression "affecting the liability of any dealer to pay tax" in section 44 was construed to mean an order that changes the liability to pay a quantified tax liability created by assessment, not the underlying primary liability arising on the taxable event. A remand order which merely directs fresh assessment does not by itself increase or decrease the amount payable, and therefore does not answer the statutory requirement. The saving language in section 52 was held not to control the interpretation of section 44. The cited authorities on assessment liability were distinguished, and the absence of a final assessment was treated as decisive.
Conclusion: No reference lay against the remand order, and the references were incompetent.