Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 was sustainable when service tax had been paid within time but the returns were filed late and no notice under Section 70(2) was served.
Analysis: The assessee had discharged the tax liability within the prescribed time. The delay related only to filing of returns. The record also showed that no notice was served under Section 70(2), and the case was covered by the Tribunal's earlier decision in a connected matter arising from the same order-in-appeal, where penalty had been set aside in similar circumstances.
Conclusion: The penalty was not sustainable and was set aside, with the appeal allowed.