Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a best judgment assessment could be sustained when the assessee's seized account books were unavailable to him and the assessing authority did not invoke its power to summon the relevant documents before completing the assessment.
Analysis: The assessment was founded on the assumption that the assessee had failed to furnish evidence in support of claimed exemptions. The record showed, however, that the relevant books and papers were in the custody of the Central Excise authorities, and the assessee could not produce them without assistance. Section 35(1)(a)(ii) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 empowered the assessing authority to call for the necessary documents, and Rule 33(3) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1959 required a best judgment assessment to be made with due regard to surrounding circumstances and all other relevant matters. Late filing of returns might attract penalty under section 17(3), but it did not justify denying the assessee any opportunity to produce evidence or proceeding ex parte on an erroneous premise.
Conclusion: The best judgment assessment could not be sustained, and the assessee was entitled to a fresh assessment after the relevant documents were summoned and considered.