Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of tax collected on declared goods sold in inter-State trade could be denied on the ground that the claimant, being a second purchaser, had not personally paid the tax under the State Act.
Analysis: Article 286(3) of the Constitution of India and section 15(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 require the State law to provide for refund where tax has been levied on declared goods and those goods are subsequently sold in inter-State trade or commerce. The first proviso to section 5(4) of the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957 and rule 39-A of the Mysore Sales Tax Rules contemplate refund to the dealer who has made the inter-State sale, subject only to the statutory conditions that tax has been collected on the declared goods and that the goods are later sold in inter-State trade. No additional requirement can be read into the rule that the same dealer must have been the person who originally paid the tax under the State Act.
Conclusion: The denial of refund on the ground that the assessee had not itself paid the tax was unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to refund.
Final Conclusion: The revision petitions succeeded and the assessee obtained the refund claimed under the State sales tax scheme as harmonised with the central law governing declared goods.
Ratio Decidendi: Where declared goods taxed under the State law are subsequently sold in inter-State trade, refund cannot be refused by imposing a condition not found in the governing statute or rule, and the refund must be granted to the dealer satisfying the statutory requirements.