Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applications for reference under section 22(1) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act were barred by limitation.
Analysis: The limitation period for an application under section 22(1) was sixty days from the order sought to be challenged. As neither the petitioners nor their counsel were present when the order was passed and no communication of the order was sent to them, the period was held to commence from the date on which they obtained knowledge of the order. The petitioners obtained a certified copy on 6 June 1967, and the application was made on 7 August 1967, with the requisite fee paid on 8 August 1967. A valid application was therefore treated as having been made on 8 August 1967, which was beyond the prescribed period, and even 7 August 1967 was after expiry of limitation.
Conclusion: The applications were barred by limitation and were rightly rejected.