Retrospective validating statute can cure tax levy on dissolved firm only if it expressly removes the original defect.

A retrospective validating statute can cure an invalid tax levy only where it removes the defect in the original law and clearly validates the assessment. A levy for 1962-63 on a dissolved firm under the repealed General Sales Tax Act remained invalid because the proceedings could not be treated as initiated under the later Act and the earlier law did not authorise such levy; the defect was not cured by the amendment. By contrast, the levy for 1963-64 was sustained because section 21A was retrospectively inserted from 1 April 1963 and section 7 of the Amendment Act validated prior assessments notwithstanding earlier orders.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the levy of sales tax for the year 1962-63 on a dissolved firm, assessed after repeal of the earlier Act, remained valid or was saved by the amending and validating legislation; (ii) Whether the levy for the year 1963-64 on the dissolved firm was validated by the retrospective insertion of section 21A and the validating provision in section 7 of the Amendment Act.

Issue (i): Whether the levy of sales tax for the year 1962-63 on a dissolved firm, assessed after repeal of the earlier Act, remained valid or was saved by the amending and validating legislation.

Analysis: The liability for the 1962-63 year arose under the repealed General Sales Tax Act, 1125, and the relevant proceedings could not be treated as proceedings initiated under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 merely because a provisional assessment had earlier been made. Provisional assessment and final assessment were held to be separate and independent proceedings. Since the earlier Act did not provide for levy on a dissolved firm, the defect identified in the governing law was not removed by the later amendment enacted under the 1963 Act.

Conclusion: The levy for 1962-63 was invalid and was not validated; this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the levy for the year 1963-64 on the dissolved firm was validated by the retrospective insertion of section 21A and the validating provision in section 7 of the Amendment Act.

Analysis: The levy for 1963-64 was governed by the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, as retrospectively amended. Section 21A, given effect from 1 April 1963, authorized assessment of a dissolved firm as if dissolution had not occurred, and section 7 of the Amendment Act validated assessments already made notwithstanding any prior judicial or appellate order. The later legislation removed the basis of the earlier invalidity and therefore neutralised the effect of the appellate order setting aside the assessment.

Conclusion: The levy for 1963-64 stood validated and was sustained; this issue was decided in favour of the revenue.

Final Conclusion: The challenge succeeded only in relation to the assessment for 1962-63, while the assessment for 1963-64 was upheld by reason of the validating legislation. The appeal was accordingly allowed in part.

Ratio Decidendi: A retrospective validating statute can cure an invalid tax levy only where it removes the defect in the original law and clearly validates the levy; a levy under a repealed enactment cannot be validated by amendments to a different governing statute unless the earlier defect is expressly and effectively cured.

---