Court rules gift of national savings certificates invalid due to lack of consent, upholds assessee's exemption claim.

The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the gift of national savings certificates was invalid due to the lack of prior written consent as required by section 3 of the Savings Act. As the gift did not meet statutory requirements, the inclusion of the amount in the assessee's income was unsustainable. The court emphasized strict adherence to statutory provisions and clarified that no estoppel can be raised against a statute declaring an act void. Consequently, the exemption claimed by the assessee was upheld against the Revenue's denial.

---

---

Issues Involved:
The judgment involves the interpretation of section 3 of the Savings Act regarding the validity of a gift of national savings certificates and the applicability of exemption claimed by the assessee.

Interpretation of Section 3 of the Savings Act:
The court examined whether the gift of national savings certificates made by the assessee's husband was valid u/s 3 of the Savings Act, which requires prior written consent for transfer. As no such consent was obtained, the court held that the gift was not valid, emphasizing that there can be no estoppel against the statute. The court explained the concept of estoppel and its inapplicability when a statute declares an act void and unlawful. Consequently, the court concluded that the mandatory provisions of section 3 of the Savings Act prevented the Revenue from denying the exemption claimed by the assessee.

Validity of the Gift and Exemption Claim:
The Tribunal had earlier held that there was no valid gift due to the lack of consent as required by section 3 of the Savings Act, thus ruling that the inclusion of Rs. 32,500 in the assessee's income was not sustainable. The court affirmed the Tribunal's decision, stating that the gifts were invalid as they did not meet the requirements of section 3 of the Savings Act. Therefore, the court answered the referred question in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, upholding the exemption claimed by the assessee.

Significance of Section 3 of the Savings Act:
The court emphasized the importance of complying with the provisions of section 3 of the Savings Act, highlighting that the absence of prior written consent for transfer rendered the gift of national savings certificates invalid. The court reiterated that statutory requirements must be strictly adhered to, and no estoppel can be raised against a statute declaring an act void.

This judgment clarifies the legal implications of gifting national savings certificates and the necessity of complying with statutory provisions, particularly section 3 of the Savings Act, to ensure the validity of such transactions and the eligibility for claimed exemptions.

---