Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the contract for building railway coaches on railway-supplied underframes was a pure works contract or a contract of sale of goods liable to sales tax.
Analysis: The contract, read as a whole, described the undertaking as building coaches on railway underframes, with the property in the underframes remaining with the railway throughout. The payment structure was a lump sum for execution of the entire work, including materials, labour, fitting, furnishing and finishing, and the agreement contained clauses consistent with execution of work rather than sale, including interim payments during progress, railway control over specifications, indemnity for entrusted railway property, and contractual provisions dealing with suspension and determination of the work. The Court applied the settled principle that a taxable sale within a works contract arises only where there is an independent agreement for sale of the very goods, and not merely a transfer of property as an incident of the work. On the facts, the department did not establish any independent contract of sale of coaches.
Conclusion: The contract was a works contract and not a sale of railway coaches. The amount received was not taxable as sales turnover and the answer was against the revenue and in favour of the assessee.