Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale of gold ornaments studded with imitation stones or engraved with mina, but without precious stones, fell under item No. 3F or item No. 67 of Notification No. 33927F dated 30th December 1957.
Analysis: Item No. 3F covered ornaments of personal wear made of gold or silver, or a mixture of gold and silver, unless they were studded with the specified precious stones. Ornaments studded only with imitation stones, engraved with mina, or otherwise not containing the enumerated precious stones remained within item No. 3F. Item No. 28 concerned jewellery set with precious stones and real pearls and had no application. Item No. 67 was a residuary entry and applied only when the goods did not fall within any specific entry. Since the ornaments in question squarely answered item No. 3F, the residuary entry could not be invoked.
Conclusion: The ornaments were taxable under item No. 3F and were not taxable under item No. 67.