Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cotton purchased by the assessee at Bhatinda and transferred through its Bombay branch for export outside India was liable to sales tax under section 5(2)(a)(vi) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948.
Analysis: The assessee purchased cotton at Bhatinda and thereafter sent it to its head office at Bombay, from where it was exported outside India. The transfer from the Bhatinda branch to Bombay did not amount to a sale within the State of Punjab. The taxable sale, if any, was the export transaction, and the transaction was found to be in the course of export. On that footing, the amount claimed was not includible in taxable turnover and the assessment made by the taxing authority was unsustainable.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the deduction and the sale was not liable to sales tax at Bhatinda.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the order setting aside the assessment was maintained.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods purchased within the State and subsequently transferred to another branch for export are not taxable as an intra-State sale where the sale is found to be in the course of export.