TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court: No Weighted Deduction without Link to Sales Promotion</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Noor Handicrafts</h3> Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Noor Handicrafts - [2000] 245 ITR 309, 118 TAXMANN 75 Issues:1. Interpretation of section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding weighted deduction on specific expenditures.2. Allowability of weighted deduction on salaries, stationery, rent, and postage under section 35B.3. Application of the nine categories mentioned in section 35B(1)(b) to determine eligibility for weighted deduction.Analysis:Issue 1: The primary issue in this case pertains to the interpretation of section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, specifically regarding the allowance of weighted deduction on certain expenditures incurred by an exporter.Issue 2: The Tribunal considered the claim for weighted deduction on various expenses, including salaries, stationery, rent, and postage. The Tribunal allowed weighted deduction on salaries, stationery, rent, and 75% of postage. However, it disallowed weighted deduction on miscellaneous expenses and interest paid by the assessee.Issue 3: The Tribunal's decision was based on the application of the nine categories outlined in section 35B(1)(b) to determine the eligibility for weighted deduction. The Tribunal noted that without establishing that the expenditures fell within the specified categories, the claim for weighted deduction could not be allowed.The Tribunal's order highlighted the importance of demonstrating that the expenditures were incurred wholly and exclusively on the activities specified in the relevant clauses of section 35B(1)(b). The Tribunal's decision emphasized the necessity of linking the expenses to the promotion of sales outside India to qualify for weighted deduction under section 35B.In conclusion, the High Court held that the Tribunal erred in allowing weighted deduction on salaries, stationery, and rent without establishing that these expenses were directly related to the promotion of sales outside India as required by the provisions of section 35B. The Court answered the referred question in the negative, emphasizing the importance of examining the nature of each expenditure to determine its eligibility for weighted deduction under section 35B.
TaxTMI 