Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in dismissing the assessee's appeals as defective without issuing notice to cure the alleged defects and without affording an opportunity to rectify them.
Analysis: The appeals had been filed through a practising chartered accountant, and the Tribunal declined to proceed when no power of attorney was found in his favour and when the memorandum of appeal was treated as argumentative and defective. In income-tax appeals, disposal must be on merits, and where a curable defect is noticed, the appellant should be informed and given an opportunity to remove it. The assessee could not be made to suffer for omissions attributable to its representative, particularly when no defect memo had been issued and no opportunity was given to amend the memorandum.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's order was illegal and unsustainable; the writ petition was allowed, the impugned order was quashed, and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh decision in accordance with law.